GS4 Ethics: How to Stop Writing Essays and Start Scoring Marks
GS4 Ethics: The Structure Is the Score
Why Most GS4 Answers Score Poorly
Ethics Paper (GS4) has a common failure mode: aspirants write long, sincere paragraphs about values without structure. The examiner is reading 400+ papers. A structured answer with clear definitions, relevant philosophical grounding, and concrete examples scores far higher than a well-intentioned essay.
The paper has two parts:
- Section A: Theoretical ethics (aptitude, foundational values, emotional intelligence, attitude, moral thinkers)
- Section B: Case studies (you are given a scenario and must analyse the ethical dilemmas, stakeholders, and course of action)
The Core Thinkers You Must Know Correctly
Immanuel Kant (Deontology): Right action is determined by duty, not consequences. The Categorical Imperative: "Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." Application: A civil servant should not take a bribe even if it produces good outcomes — the act itself is wrong regardless of consequence.
John Stuart Mill (Utilitarianism): Right action maximises total happiness ("greatest good for the greatest number"). Application: A policy that harms a few but benefits millions may be ethically justified — used to argue for large infrastructure projects displacing small communities.
Aristotle (Virtue Ethics): Focus on...
Keep reading with a free account
Sign up to unlock this full concept note and track your progress across all topics. No spam, ever.